Women are evil sluts who want to torture men

I know I'm hammering at this, but it just pisses me off to no end. Leave it to the right wing to take what should be egg on their collective faces over Iraq and see an opportunity to bash the half of the human race with wicked, wicked uteruses. It's important that we don't let them turn lemons into lemonade on this one.
Today's contender for the "If that's really how you feel, shut your mouth and go back to the kitchen" award is Deborah Simmons. Deborah gets special attention because she manages to remind people that women are not ony cruel but filthy sluts as well:

One suspect in the ongoing criminal investigations, Pvt. Lynndie England, found herself reassigned to Fort Bragg, N.C., after she became pregnant. Which came first? The pregnancy or the photo op?
Call it Tailhook Meets Girls Gone Wild or Freaknit Meets Operation Iraqi Freedom.

If England marries the man who impregnated her (as a torture suspect) and joins Operation Rescue, does she get to become a good girl, Simmons?
She reaches new heights of ability to blame females for absolutely everything, regardless of logic. For instance:

What were Congress and the Clinton White House thinking when they began, in earnest, legislative moves that essentially led to the feminization of America's armed forces? Did they think that there would be no cultural implications (pregnancies, rape and sexual assault, etc.?)

If men in the armed forces rape women, then it is the fault you see of women for being there. However, shortly thereafter:

Look what we have wrought: a woman, with no experience running a penal institution, in charge of all penal institutions in Iraq; scores of reports about women soldiers participating in the mistreatment of male prisoners (including sexual degradation); photographic evidence that the "girls" were equal partners with the "boys" in these criminal acts — during a war, no less; the possibility that one of those "girls," a suspect in these wholly un-American abuses and shameful acts — was impregnated while fighting in a war.

In this case, when women are the rapists, it suddenly is the fault of the rapists. It isn't the raping that's wrong so much as it's the women's participation. Women--if they aren't tempting men into violence, they're committing it themselves. And getting pregnant while doing it! The way these feminists act, you would think that it takes both a man and a woman to make a baby, for God's sake!
Of course, lurking in this opportunistic anti-woman screed is just a tiny hint that even she knows she's full of shit:

You can even take the women out of the picture and the disturbing images remain the same. It's no laughing matter.

Yes, it would. And pretending that this stuff wouldn't have been going on if the women were gone isn't going to change the facts.

Via Media Matters.